Building Firms: Why You Should Just Avoid Disputes

Building disputes happen all the time in Australia. After all, we are a nation that is constantly on the tools, so there is the chance that a disagreement will happen every day. Typically, these disagreements are small and easily-resolvable, with both parties getting on with it like nothing ever happened.

But they can be incredibly unpleasant for both parties if they get out of hand. Here, we are going to talk about the building firm side of things and why they should work to avoid big disagreements. Because, after all, while a construction argument can be terrible for the homeowner, it can also be disastrous for the construction company.

So, with this in mind, here are a few reasons why construction companies should work to dissolve disputes as opposed to escalating them:

1. They can inhibit new contracts

The best building disputes lawyers Melbourne has have seen it all before. They have seen the downsides of what happens when a construction company gets stuck in an ongoing disagreement that escalates by the day. Naturally, one of the worst things that can happen to a construction company in an ongoing argument is putting down the tools and delaying the end of construction.

And why is that bad for business? Well, you’ve already guessed it: you simply cannot move onto a new job until you finish the one you are currently undertaking. Depending on your situation, you may be in the right or wrong, but regardless, it is highly likely you will be ordered to finish the job you started.

Now, say you and the team put down the tools for a month or two waiting for the disagreement to resolve. This is one, two, maybe three months without signing a new contract with a new homeowner. This is seriously money that has gone out the window due to something that probably could have been quite easily resolved in the first place.

• They can damage your reputation

A construction disagreement can harm a company’s reputation even if they are in the right. This is because a lot of stigma revolves around building disputes. What’s more, they can even be the cause of industry gossip, and lead to a construction company looking bad within the industry even if it was obvious they were in the right.

It’s basically like this: avoid construction disagreements to avoid looking bad. The last thing you want are a bunch of developers starting to speak ill of your company name even though you did nothing wrong. You will be well aware that the industry can be incredibly harsh as there is so much at stake.

Therefore, the best thing to do is avoid a disagreement to protect your company’s reputation!

• They can be incredibly costly

Nobody wants to go to Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal ( VCAT ). It’s daunting, frustrating, tedious and, oh, yeah, costly! The VCAT process is one that can cost you and the homeowners thousands of dollars, this is building lawyer cost and the process, and it is simply something you want to avoid.

Therefore, the last thing you want to do is get drawn into a long process of who did what – it will drag on until you find yourself in front of VCAT explaining what should have been an easily-resolvable situation in the first place.

As you can see, there is no point in getting into a building dispute – they are nothing but harmful for your profit and reputation and should be avoided at all costs!

Read business articles related to Sales, Marketing,  Advertising, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Management, Education, and Industry at SugerMint.